🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is seeking compensation amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step is a clear response from the Kremlin against proposals to use frozen Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on reports in local state media, the central bank filed a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

EU leaders are set to determine in the coming days regarding a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and financial needs.

The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union officials have argued that their plan is legally sound. Their position rests on the fact that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, even though it was frozen in EU jurisdictions following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal actions, such as seizing EU corporate holdings within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements seen as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States."

The clearing house declined to comment on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past stated it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in European nations are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian courts, analysts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant assets can be located," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities said they are working on measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Kyiv would only be required to repay the money if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense damage inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful signal that when you cause all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."